Current:Home > reviewsIs $4.3 million the new retirement number? -Wealthify
Is $4.3 million the new retirement number?
View
Date:2025-04-14 09:41:57
One of the toughest things about saving for retirement is that it's hard to estimate how much money you'll actually need to cover your senior living costs in full. After all, there are so many factors that will go into that equation, including your retirement age, the state of your health, your desired lifestyle, and inflation, to name only some.
In fact, you'll often hear that it's wise to aim for $1 million in savings because that sum is more likely to be enough to cover your costs throughout your senior years. Or is it?
The reality is that $1 million is an easy, clean number to land on. But for many retirees, it might fall short.
In fact, in a recent New York Life survey, today's workers said it would take an average of $4,342,378.86 in savings to be able to retire comfortably. But given where savers are at today, that sort of balance may be unrealistic.
Do you really need $4.3 million in retirement?
While Americans might think it will take around $4.3 million to retire without financial worries, their current 401(k) and IRA balances tell a much different story. That's because the average saver today only has $135,161.50 socked away.
Granted, it may be possible to grow $135,000 and change into roughly $4.3 million. Let's say you're 31 years old with $135,000 in savings and you want to retire at 67, which is full retirement age for Social Security purposes. If you were to stock away $1,000 a month between now and then at an average annual 8% return, which is a bit below the stock market's average, then you'd get to $4.4 million in time for retirement.
But a lot of people can't part with $12,000 a year for retirement savings purposes. And also, a lot of people who have $135,000 and change in savings are much older than their early 30s. So for a lot of people, getting to the $4.3 million mark isn't so doable.
Of course, it's important to ask the question of whether $4.3 million is really the right number to be aiming for. And the answer is that for some people, it might be.
But again, there's no single retirement savings target that guarantees you financial security throughout your senior years. So rather than fixate on a number that a survey arrives at, a better bet is to do your own number-crunching and planning to come up with a savings goal that's likely to allow you to meet your personal needs.
Remember, someone who wants to spend retirement gardening and spending time with family might need a lot less money than someone intending to retire in a large city and enjoy nightlife all the time. So while it may not be a bad idea for you to aim for $4.3 million in savings, you also shouldn't feel compelled to.
And do keep in mind that while $4.3 million is clearly a lot of money, even that sum doesn't guarantee that you won't run out. If you aren't careful, it's possible to spend down a nest egg of any size too quickly. So no matter what savings number you land on, you should not only work your hardest to attain it, but also, manage your money strategically once retirement does roll around.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $21,756 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $21,756 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
veryGood! (34)
Related
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- 'Marvel at it now:' A’ja Wilson’s greatness on display as Aces pursue WNBA three-peat
- Euphoric two years ago, US anti-abortion movement is now divided and worried as election nears
- Two dead, three hurt after a shooting in downtown Minneapolis
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Georgia State Election Board approves rule requiring hand count of ballots
- Hilarie Burton Shares Update on One Tree Hill Revival
- North America’s Biggest Food Companies Are Struggling to Lower Their Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Trump's 'stop
- Did Lyle Menendez wear a hair piece? Why it came up in pivotal scene of Netflix's new 'Monsters' series
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Where is the best fall foliage? Maps and forecast for fall colors.
- Lizzo Unveils Before-and-After Look at Weight Loss Transformation
- Kailyn Lowry Shares Her Secrets for Managing the Chaos of Life With 7 Kids
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Jessie Bates ready to trash talk Travis Kelce Sunday night using Taylor Swift
- Michigan deputy jumps into action to save 63-year-old man in medical emergency: Video
- Aaron Rodgers isn't a savior just yet, but QB could be just what Jets need
Recommendation
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
Wisconsin Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stays on ballot
Illinois upends No. 22 Nebraska in OT to stay unbeaten
Closing arguments begin in civil trial over ‘Trump Train’ encounter with Biden-Harris bus in Texas
'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
DNA match leads to arrest in 1988 cold case killing of Boston woman Karen Taylor
Foster family pleads guilty to abusing children who had been tortured by parents
Feds extradite man for plot to steal $8 million in FEMA disaster assistance